Building PourMath as an SEO experiment
I built PourMath, a set of concrete calculators, partly as a controlled place to test SEO. Here is what I am tuning and what actually moves the needle.
PourMath is a set of concrete calculators for the jobsite. It is also, quietly, a lab. I wanted a small, low-stakes property where I could test SEO fine-tuning in isolation and actually learn what moves rankings, instead of guessing on a product where a hundred other variables are in play. Concrete calculators turned out to be the perfect subject.
Why a concrete calculator
The best SEO testbed has clear, boring, evergreen search intent. People literally type “concrete calculator” and “how much concrete for a slab” into Google every day, all year, with an obvious goal: get a number. There is no ambiguity about what a good result looks like. That makes it easy to tell whether a change helped, because the queries are stable and the intent is sharp.
It is also a niche the big content sites largely ignore. Low glamour, high intent. Exactly where a small, fast, focused page can win.
What I am actually tuning
The point was to change one lever at a time and watch what happens in Search Console. The levers I have been testing:
- Intent match above all. One calculator per job, named the way people search: slabs, footings, columns, bag counts. A page that answers the exact query beats a generic “calculator” page every time.
- Content depth around the tool. The calculators are wrapped in plain-language guides and a glossary, so the page is not a thin widget. Depth gives the page something to rank for beyond the one keyword.
- Speed and zero friction. It is fast on a phone and there is no sign-up wall between the user and the answer. Getting to the number instantly is both good UX and a real ranking signal.
- Structured data. FAQ schema on the questions people actually ask, so the page can earn richer results.
- Titles and meta that match the search, not my branding. On a tool page, the query wins over cleverness.
What has actually moved the needle
The honest takeaway so far: intent match dwarfs everything else. A page that maps cleanly to one real query outperforms a better-designed page that is vaguely about the topic. Speed and removing the sign-up wall came next, both for rankings and for the metrics Google watches after the click. The fancier work, schema and copy polish, helped at the margins but only after the fundamentals were right.
The other lesson is patience. SEO changes do not report back for weeks. A small, stable property like PourMath makes that wait bearable, because the signal is not buried under product churn.
Why this matters for the rest
Everything I learn tuning PourMath feeds back into how I build the other things on the hub, including the landing pages here. A dedicated calculator that nails one query is the same idea as a dedicated landing page that nails one product. Test it where the stakes are low, then apply it where they are not.
// newsletter
Liked this? Get the next one.
New products, what worked, what broke, and the SEO and indie-hacking lessons behind them. Occasional, no spam, unsubscribe any time.
More on what I am building over on the hub.